Citri, Nathan (Natan Cytrynowski), 1921- (Polish born Israeli biologist)
Dates
- Existence: 21 April 1921
Found in 15 Collections and/or Records:
Correspondence, 1955-1956
The material consists of correspondence between Nathan Citri and Martin Rivers Pollock, dated 1955-1956. It relates to a visit by Citri to work with Pollock at Mill Hill.
Correspondence, 1957
The material consists of correspondence between Nathan Citri and Martin Rivers Pollock, dated 1957. It mostly relates to a paper by Citri on penicillinase.
Correspondence, 1958
The material consists of correspondence between Nathan Citri and Martin Rivers Pollock, dated 1958. It mainly relates to work on penicillinase. It includes a copy of a draft paper sent to Pollock for comment.
Correspondence, 1959-1960
The material consists of correspondence between Nathan Citri and Martin Rivers Pollock, dated 1959-1960. It relates to penicillinase.
Correspondence, 1961-1962
The material consists of correspondence between Nathan Citri and Martin Rivers Pollock, dated 1961-1962. It includes Pollock's comments on drafts (not included in the file) which were sent to him.
Correspondence, 1963
The material consists of correspondence between Nathan Citri and Martin Rivers Pollock, dated 1963. It mainly concerns work on B. cereus penicillinase. It includes a draft sent to Pollock for comment.
Correspondence, 1964-1965
The material consists of correspondence between Nathan Citri and Martin Rivers Pollock, dated 1964-1965. It mainly relates to penicillinase and Citri's requests for Pollock to comments on his drafts.
Correspondence, 1966
The material consists of correspondence between Nathan Citri and Martin Rivers Pollock, dated 1966.
Correspondence, 1966
The material consists of correspondence between Nathan Citri and Martin Rivers Pollock, dated 1966. It includes comments on drafts by Citri.
Correspondence, 1967
The material consists of correspondence between Nathan Citri and Martin Rivers Pollock, dated 1967. It includes data and draft on beta-lactamase work by Citri, with comments by Pollock.